MC68340CAB16E
MC68340CAB16E
Active
Description:  IC MPU M683XX 16MHZ 144QFP
Manufacturer:  Freescale Semiconductor
History Price: $62.96000
In Stock: 12800
MC68340CAB16E Specification
Specification
Part No
MC68340CAB16E
Category
Embedded - Microprocessors
Manufacturer
Freescale Semiconductor
Series
M683xx
Packaging
Bulk
Status
Active
Environmental Compliance
Lead Free
Radiation Hardening
No
REACH SVHC
No SVHC
RoHS
Compliant
HS Code
-
Technical Parameter
Core Processor
CPU32
Number of Cores/Bus Width
1 Core, 32-Bit
Speed
16MHz
Co-Processors/DSP
-
RAM Controllers
DRAM
Graphics Acceleration
No
Display & Interface Controllers
-
Ethernet
-
SATA
-
USB
-
Voltage - I/O
5.0V
Operating Temperature
-40 ℃ ~ 85 ℃ (TA)
Security Features
-
Package / Case
Surface Mount
Supplier Device Package
144-BQFP
MC68340CAB16E PDF Datasheet
MC68340CAB16E Related Parts
MC68020CEH16E
MC68020CEH16E
Freescale Semiconductor
IC MPU M680X0 166MHZ 132PQFP
MC68020CEH16E
MC68020CEH16E
NXP Semiconductors
IC MPU M680X0 166MHZ 132PQFP
MC68020CEH25E
MC68020CEH25E
NXP Semiconductors
IC MPU M680X0 25MHZ 132PQFP
MC68020EH16E
MC68020EH16E
NXP Semiconductors
IC MPU M680X0 166MHZ 132PQFP
MC68020EH16E-G
MC68020EH16E-G
Rochester Electronics
MC68020EH16E-G
MC68020EH20E
MC68020EH20E
NXP Semiconductors
IC MPU M680X0 20MHZ 132PQFP
MC68020EH25E
MC68020EH25E
NXP Semiconductors
IC MPU M680X0 25MHZ 132PQFP
MC68020EH33E
MC68020EH33E
NXP Semiconductors
IC MPU M680X0 33MHZ 132PQFP
MC68020FE16E
MC68020FE16E
Freescale Semiconductor
IC MPU M680X0 166MHZ 132CQFP
MC68020FE20E
MC68020FE20E
Freescale Semiconductor
IC MPU M680X0 20MHZ 132CQFP
MC68020FE25E
MC68020FE25E
Freescale Semiconductor
IC MPU M680X0 25MHZ 132CQFP
MC6802CL
MC6802CL
Rochester Electronics
MC6802CL
MC68340CAB16E Compare Parts
  • MC68340CAB16E vs MC68VZ328VP
  • MC68340CAB16E vs MC68VZ328CVPR2
  • MC68340CAB16E vs MC68VZ328CVP
  • MC68340CAB16E vs MC68VZ328CVP
  • MC68340CAB16E vs MC68VZ328CAGR2
  • MC68340CAB16E vs MC68VZ328CAG
  • MC68340CAB16E vs MC68VZ328AGR2
  • MC68340CAB16E vs MC68VZ328AG
  • MC68340CAB16E vs MC68SECCFU20B1-FR
  • MC68340CAB16E vs MC68SECCFU20B1
  • MC68340CAB16E vs MC68SEC000PB20
  • MC68340CAB16E vs MC68SEC000PB16
  • MC68340CAB16E vs MC68SEC000FU20R2
  • MC68340CAB16E vs MC68SEC000FU20B1
  • MC68340CAB16E vs MC68SEC000FU20
  • MC68340CAB16E vs MC68SEC000FU20
  • MC68340CAB16E vs MC68SEC000FU20
  • MC68340CAB16E vs MC68SEC000FU16
  • MC68340CAB16E vs MC68SEC000FU16
  • MC68340CAB16E vs MC68SEC000FU16
  • MC68340CAB16E vs MC68SEC000FU10
  • MC68340CAB16E vs MC68SEC000CFU20
  • MC68340CAB16E vs MC68SEC000CFU16
  • MC68340CAB16E vs MC68SEC000CFU10
  • MC68340CAB16E vs MC68SEC000CAA20
  • MC68340CAB16E vs MC68SEC000CAA16-FR
  • MC68340CAB16E vs MC68SEC000CAA16
  • MC68340CAB16E vs MC68SEC000CAA10
  • MC68340CAB16E vs MC68SEC000CAA10
  • MC68340CAB16E vs MC68SEC000AE20
  • MC68340CAB16E vs MC68SEC000AE20
  • MC68340CAB16E vs MC68SEC000AE16
  • MC68340CAB16E vs MC68SEC000AE16
  • MC68340CAB16E vs MC68SEC000AE10
  • MC68340CAB16E vs MC68SEC000AA20R2
  • MC68340CAB16E vs MC68SEC000AA20R2
  • MC68340CAB16E vs MC68SEC000AA20B1
  • MC68340CAB16E vs MC68SEC000AA20
  • MC68340CAB16E vs MC68SEC000AA20
  • MC68340CAB16E vs MC68SEC000AA16R2
  • Customer Reviews
    4.95 out of 5.00 stars from 84 customer reviews from all over the world
    Maria Schneider
    Germany
    5 stars
    2026-03-31 12:15
    Delivery time cn---> D ='s day Super! Product very well packed and works best-E.G. As a replacement for the solar lamps chip "ZX808"; very good also the product description
    Stefano Rizzo
    Italy
    5 stars
    2026-03-31 09:55
    Perfect thank you
    Clément Boucher
    France
    5 stars
    2026-03-31 06:37
    Very well received
    Yago Santos Ferreira
    Brazil
    5 stars
    2026-03-31 06:15
    Always ask components from this seller. Very recommended.
    Michelle Flores
    United States
    5 stars
    2026-03-31 04:10
    100pcs ordered, 100pcs received. Sample tests good. Recommended!
    Anna Sørensen
    Denmark
    5 stars
    2026-03-31 03:29
    At last a place where the tl431 works as intended, took random 10 pcs of the 100 and testet in a circuit from datasheet all spot on 5.085v where it should be.